Comments for db benchmark.com http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress search, add, and review database performance statistics Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:26:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 Comment on dbbenchmark.com – MySQL (basic) connection pool support added by admin http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/2010/09/07/dbbenchmark-com-mysql-basic-connection-pool-support-added/#comment-24 admin Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:26:18 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?p=144#comment-24 Hi Brian – Drizzle support is in the works!

]]> Comment on dbbenchmark.com – MySQL (basic) connection pool support added by Brian Aker http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/2010/09/07/dbbenchmark-com-mysql-basic-connection-pool-support-added/#comment-23 Brian Aker Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:08:55 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?p=144#comment-23 Hi!

Have you looked at testing drizzle yet?

Cheers,
-Brian

]]> Comment on Benchmarks Database by admin http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/benchmarks/#comment-20 admin Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:45:22 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?page_id=4#comment-20 I assume you’re asking if you should favor INSERT_TX_Y or INSERT_TX_N values? This depends on what engine you’re testing. Transaction support (INSERT_TX_Y) is for testing InnoDB or other transactional engines. INSERT_TX_N is for testing non-transactional engines like MyISAM. As to the values of any stat, higher is better. More operations per second means better performance.

]]> Comment on Benchmarks Database by sammy http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/benchmarks/#comment-19 sammy Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:35:00 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?page_id=4#comment-19 Sorry, i dont understand the values. It is good to have less INSERT_TX_Y per second or do I favour a lot of INSERT_TX_Y per second? How to read the benchmark results?

]]> Comment on Benchmarks Database by John http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/benchmarks/#comment-18 John Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:47:12 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?page_id=4#comment-18 nice, i’m 2010-09-02 06:36:22. running a vm on top of win7

]]> Comment on Benchmarks Database by admin http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/benchmarks/#comment-16 admin Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:29:18 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?page_id=4#comment-16 Multiple submissions are fine – feel free to run/submit more than once. :)

]]> Comment on dbbenchmark.com – Site launched by admin http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/2010/08/28/site-launched/#comment-14 admin Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:06:46 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?p=31#comment-14 I agree it would be good to collect that information, however the benchmarks don’t load up I/O unless you manually specify an insert value of 100,000+ rows and a select value of 50,000+ rows. In the default configuration I/O is not heavily loaded since we’re testing CPU and MEMORY more than disk to keep the result on a more standard comparison.

]]> Comment on Benchmarks Database by Daniël van Eeden http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/benchmarks/#comment-13 Daniël van Eeden Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:55:12 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?page_id=4#comment-13 I’ve submitted the 5.1.50-enterprise-gpl-advanced.

]]> Comment on dbbenchmark.com – Site launched by dan http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/2010/08/28/site-launched/#comment-12 dan Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:01:19 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?p=31#comment-12 A great and valuable data would be to gather the disktype and raid setup, since that is one of the biggest bottlenecks in sql. Else the results won’t be that accurate eg. when comparing a new xeon with a sata drive vs an old amd x2 with ssd drives in raid10 :)

]]> Comment on Benchmarks Database by Alejandro http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/benchmarks/#comment-10 Alejandro Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:33:58 +0000 http://www.dbbenchmark.com/wordpress/?page_id=4#comment-10 I’m the one who submitted the Q9550 2.83GHz result. Sorry for doing it 2 times, please, delete one.

BTW: I can’t believe our DB is the fastest, The CPU was even running at 2.0 GHz!!!

]]>